New York Civil Rights Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 86,389
Borzenkova v. T-Mobile US, Inc.
as 1:2024cv03070
Plaintiff:
Valeriia Borzenkova
Defendant:
T-Mobile US, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1453 Class Action Fairness Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
Ellis et al v. Quarantillo, USCIS et al
as 1:2024cv02965
Plaintiff:
Rosezina Ellis and Gurbannepes Igdirov
Defendant:
Andrea Quarantillo, USCIS, Merrick Garland and Alejandro Mayorkas
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
225 Northport, LLC v. McMullen et al
as 2:2024cv02967
Plaintiff:
225 Northport, LLC
Defendant:
Damon McMullen, Jeremy Maline, Thomas J. Kehoe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
OGINSKI v. VIGILANT ENGINE AND HOOK AND LADDER COMPANY, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv02975
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH OGINSKI
Defendant:
VIGILANT ENGINE AND HOOK AND LADDER COMPANY, INC., JUSTIN SACHMECHI and JOSHUA CHARRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02976
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02968
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
