U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York

Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 33,525
Gencarelli v. AP&G Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2025cv00215
Plaintiff: James Gencarelli
Defendant: AP&G Co., Inc. doing business as Catchmaster, Woodstream Corporation doing business as Victor and John Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Womack v. Harrison et al
as 9:2025cv00213
Plaintiff: Korane K. Womack
Defendant: C.O. Harrison, C.O. John Doe #1, C.O. John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2025cv00211
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Kelly v. Miller et al
as 9:2025cv00206
Plaintiff: Shytique Kelly
Defendant: Mark Miller, Andrew Frazier and Lynn Lilley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ross v. King
as 5:2025cv00210
Plaintiff: Briselida Ross
Defendant: Michelle King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Roberts v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2025cv00208
Plaintiff: Brian Scott Roberts
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hanyon v. The United States et al
as 3:2025cv00212
Plaintiff: Steven J. Hanyon
Defendant: The United States and The State of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Smith et al v. Grand Union of Peru, LLC
as 8:2025cv00209
Plaintiff: Carolyn Smith and Leo Smith
Defendant: Grand Union of Peru, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Kelly v. Silver et al
as 9:2025cv00203
Plaintiff: Shytique Kelly
Defendant: L. Silver, Andrew Miller, A. Acrish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wingate v. Samad et al
as 9:2025cv00207
Plaintiff: Shakur Wingate
Defendant: Dr. Imtiaz Samad, Dr. Subbarao Ramineni, M. Esposito and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?