US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Cases 31 - 40 of 32,346
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00591
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00582
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00586
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Beekman v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00590
Plaintiff:
Ashley N Beekman
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 8:2024cv00585
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Wrobleski v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00587
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Wrobleski
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00584
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00589
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Kick et al v. County of Onondaga et al
as 5:2024cv00594
Plaintiff:
Helene Kick, Paul Barbour, Greg Dion and others
Defendant:
County of Onondaga and Donald Weber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Khalil v. State of New York Department of Corrections and Community Supervision Parole Board et al
as 9:2024cv00580
Petitioner:
Ahmed S. Khalil and Ahmed Shawki Mohamed Khalil
Respondent:
State of New York Department of Corrections and Community Supervision Parole Board and Nicole Irby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
