Federal Circuit Civil Rights Cases

Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 89
Moreno v. Nizer
as 26-1995
Plaintiff: ROSALYN ELIANA MORENO
Defendant: CHRISTINE E. NIZER, SHAFIQ RAHMAN, NATALIE EVANS HARRIS and others
Kamdem-Ouaffo v. Colgate Palmolive Co.
as 26-1726
Plaintiff: RICKY KAMDEM-OUAFFO, trading as Kamdem Group
Defendant: COLGATE PALMOLIVE CO., HILL'S PET NUTRITION INC, NATURASOURCE INTERNATIONAL LLC and others
Mejia v. Young
as 26-1545
Plaintiff: RUBEN MEJIA, G.M., a minor and LM.M, a minor
Defendant: AMANDA YOUNG, individual capacity and official capacity, JASON PHELPS, individual capacity and official capacity and RIVERSIDE COUNTY CHILDRENS SERVICES
James v. US
as 26-1439
Plaintiff: SHARON M. JAMES
Defendant: UNITED STATES, CIRCUIT CHIEF JUSTICE CHAGARES, CIRCUIT JUSTICE KENT JORDAN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-1407
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mirarchi v. Roberts We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 26-1384
Plaintiff: ERCOLE A. MIRARCHI
Defendant: JOHN G. ROBERTS, JR., CLARENCE THOMAS, SAMUEL ALITO, JR. and others
Kamdem-Ouaffo v. Leblon
as 26-1381
Plaintiff: RICKY KAMDEM-OUAFFO, trading as Kamdem Group
Defendant: VINCENT LEBLON, of the Superior Court of New Jersey, TODD B. BUCK, TERRY D. JOHNSON and others
Fulkerson v. New Mexico Department of Justice We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 26-1358
Plaintiff: WILLIAM M. FULKERSON
Defendant: NEW MEXICO DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, RAUL TORREZ, HECTOR BALDERAS and others
Kamdem-Ouaffo v. Baker Botts, LLP We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 26-1282
Plaintiff: RICKY KAMDEM-OUAFFO
Defendant: BAKER BOTTS, LLP, RICHARD B. HARPER, ROBERT LAWRENCE MAIRER and others
Davis v. Burbank Police Department We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 26-1243
Defendant: BURBANK POLICE DEPARTMENT and CITY OF BURBANK
Plaintiff: CINTARIUS DAVIS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?