U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 24,856
Atkins v. Sharpe
as 21-2346
Plaintiff / Appellant: REBEKAH A. ATKINS
Defendant / Appellee: ROGER A. G. SHARPE, Clerk, ALLISON, Chief Deputy Clerk, EVELYN, Administrative Matters (including personnel) HR of Clerk's Office and others
SSI Technologies, LLC v. Dongguan Zhengyang Electronic Mechanical Ltd
as 21-2345
Plaintiff / Appellant: SSI TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Defendant / Appellee: DONGGUAN ZHENGYANG ELECTRONIC MECHANICAL LTD
Atkins v. Sykes
as 21-2344
Plaintiff / Appellant: REBEKAH A. ATKINS
Defendant / Appellee: CHIEF CIRCUIT JUDGE DIANE S. SYKES, JUDGE WILLIAM J. BAUER, JUDGE JOEL M. FLAUM and others
ESIP Series 1, LLC v. doTerra International, LLC
as 21-2343
Plaintiff / Appellant: ESIP SERIES 1, LLC
Plaintiff: ESIP SERIES 2, LLC
Defendant / Appellee: DOTERRA INTERNATIONAL, LLC, PUZHEN, LLC, PUZHEN LIFE USA, LLC
Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. v. Eagle Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
as 21-2342
Plaintiff / Appellant: PAR PHARMACEUTICAL, INC., PAR STERILE PRODUCTS, LLC, ENDO PAR INNOVATION COMPANY, LLC
Defendant / Appellee: EAGLE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Satco Products, Inc. v. Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
as 21-2337
Appellant: SATCO PRODUCTS, INC.
Appellee: SEOUL SEMICONDUCTOR CO., LTD.
UCB, Inc. v. Mylan Technologies Inc.
as 21-2336
Plaintiff / Appellant: UCB, INC., UCB PHARMA GMBH, LTS LOHMANN THERAPIE-SYSTEME AG
Defendant / Appellee: MYLAN TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Columbia Sportswear North America, Inc. v. Seirus Innovative Accessories, Inc.
as 21-2338
Plaintiff / Appellee: COLUMBIA SPORTSWEAR NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Defendant / Appellant: SEIRUS INNOVATIVE ACCESSORIES, INC.
Deshner v. McDonough
as 21-2341
Claimant: CHARLES E. DESHNER
Respondent / Appellee: DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
EcoFactor, Inc. v. ITC
as 21-2339
Appellant: ECOFACTOR, INC.
Appellee: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?