Illinois Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,000
Slaton v. Armstrong
as 3:2026cv01065
Plaintiff:
Wayne Slaton
Defendant:
William Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv03260
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Smith v. Adams et al
as 1:2026cv01348
Plaintiff:
Ryan Smith
Defendant:
Suzanne Adams, Arlene Bluth, Rowan Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv09738
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv09736
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
McFarland et al v. Illinois Department of Children and Family Services
as 1:2026cv01347
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, DCFS, DCFS of Illinois and others
Plaintiff:
Miranda McFarland, Ryan Emberton, T.O.E. (2019) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Elseng v. Walgreens Co.
as 1:2026cv09643
Plaintiff:
Nicole Elseng
Defendant:
Walgreens Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Stuckey v. Wisconsin Central, Ltd.
as 1:2026cv09663
Plaintiff:
Courtney Stuckey
Defendant:
Wisconsin Central, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv50344
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv09665
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
