US District Court for the Central District of Illinois Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,533
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03283
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02201
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
Crowder, III v. Umholtz
as 1:2023cv01359
Plaintiff:
Willie L Crowder, III
Defendant:
Stewart Umholtz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01357
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Molumby v. Wormuth
as 4:2023cv04152
Plaintiff:
Lisa R. Molumby
Defendant:
Christine Wormuth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
Nevill et al v. Cox et al
as 3:2023cv03273
Plaintiff:
Douglas Nevill, Becky Nevill, Jordin Nevill and others
Defendant:
Dan W Cox, Suzanne Keller and Rochester CUSD 3A
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Douglas v. Woodford County et al
as 1:2023cv01342
Plaintiff:
Gregory D Douglas
Defendant:
Woodford County, Woodford County Board and Charles Feeney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Starwalt v. Odd Fellow Rebekah Nursing Home et al
as 2:2023cv02193
Plaintiff:
Danita Starwalt
Defendant:
Odd Fellow Rebekah Nursing Home and IL IOOF Old Folks Home Mattoon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Walls v. John Does 1-5
as 1:2023cv01340
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Ray Walls
Defendant:
John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
