US District Court for the Central District of Illinois Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,893
Lee v. Lopez et al
as 4:2024cv04168
Defendant:
Marissa Lopez, Supervisor Kristal and Circle K Corporation
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03257
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02214
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01324
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Zolicoffer v. OSF Healthcare Saint Francis Medical Center et al
as 1:2024cv01322
Defendant:
OSF Healthcare Saint Francis Medical Center, DO Christian G, MD Kothawala Saad and others
Plaintiff:
Talya Zolicoffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03251
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Perkins v. Stephens et al
as 3:2024cv03248
Defendant:
Justin Stephens, Paul . and Xfinity
Plaintiff:
Danielle Perkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01318
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Leroy-Williams v. American Express Company
as 3:2024cv03244
Defendant:
American Express Company
Plaintiff:
Kreshon Leroy-Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
