US District Court for the Central District of Illinois Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,636
Richards v. Plunk
as 3:2019cv03259
Defendant:
Unknown and Unnamed Defendants, Randy Plunk
Plaintiff:
Joshua Richards
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights
Thompson v. City of Danville et al
as 1:2019cv01361
Defendant:
Dawn Hartshorn, Joshua Edington, City of Danville
and others
Plaintiff:
Graylan Thompson
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Alwan v. City of Le Roy et al
as 1:2019cv01358
Plaintiff:
Ron Alwan
Defendant:
City of Le Roy, Chief Jason Williamson, Unknown Le Roy Police Officers
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Lane v. Mason County Illinois et al
as 3:2019cv03258
Defendant:
Robert Beck, Brandon Painter, Mason County, Illinois
and others
Plaintiff:
Desiree Lane
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Sanchez v. Robinson et al
as 2:2019cv02298
Defendant:
CO Ramone Robinson, CO Smith, Warden Teri Kennedy
and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Sanchez
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Washington v. Glenn et al
as 2:2019cv02297
Plaintiff:
Alexandria Annie Washington, Azmiyah Island Bey
Defendant:
Charles A Montorio-Archer, James Glenn, Matthew Sullivan
and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Haynes v. Astrella et al
as 2:2019cv02296
Plaintiff:
Terrence Haynes
Defendant:
Kenneth Lowman, County of Kankakee, Kankakee County Public Defender's Office
and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Hall v. City of Champaign et al
as 2:2019cv02275
Defendant:
Count of Champaign Illinois, Unknown Champaign County Sheriff's Deputies, Unknown City of Champaign Police Officers
and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Hall
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Swope v. Pekin Police Department et al
as 1:2019cv01326
Defendant:
Janet Knee, Pekin Police Department, Donald . Knee
and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph A Swope
Cause Of Action: Diversity-(Citizenship)
Turner vs Thompson et al
as 2:2019cv02248
Plaintiff:
Mahogany Turner
Defendant:
City of Champaign, Kay Thompson
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
