US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Civil Rights Cases

Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 28,587
Wells v. Idleberg et al
as 1:2024cv01531
Plaintiff: Derrick L Wells
Defendant: John D. Idleberg, Nicholas Kalfas and Lake County, Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santoyo v. North Riverside Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv01505
Plaintiff: Ruben Santoyo
Defendant: North Riverside Police Department and STT Security and Investigations
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01517
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Flournoy v. Biden
as 1:2024cv01477
Plaintiff: Mike Flournoy
Defendant: Joesph Biden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Sirochinsky v. Big Health, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01488
Plaintiff: Yury Sirochinsky
Defendant: Big Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01470
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Brisco v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv01458
Plaintiff: Kenneth Brisco
Defendant: City Of Chicago, Jason Vogler, Don De Vito and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01454
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01448
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01450
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?