D.C. Circuit Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02503
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02509
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02491
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CONTE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2026cv02483
Plaintiff:
NIMATOULAYE CONTE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and LATOSHA BELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
MALLGREN v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2026cv02477
Petitioner:
ANTHONY B. MALLGREN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES and NEW YORK STATE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02457
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02468
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
YOUNG AMERICA'S FOUNDATION v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al
as 1:2026cv02449
Plaintiff:
YOUNG AMERICA'S FOUNDATION
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, SCOTT BESSENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DORSEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2026cv02448
Plaintiff:
NAKIA YVONNE DORSEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
