Arkansas Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 444
Emfinger v. Pinnacle Media
as 5:2025cv05074
Plaintiff:
Ronald Brian Emfinger
Defendant:
Pinnacle Media doing business as Univision Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Emfinger v. La Zeta 95.7 Inc.
as 5:2025cv05075
Plaintiff:
Ronald Brian Emfinger
Defendant:
La Zeta 95.7 Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
McDermott v. Arkansas Flag & Banner Inc
as 4:2025cv00330
Plaintiff:
Matthew McDermott
Defendant:
Arkansas Flag & Banner Inc
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Kipp Flores Architects, LLC v. Royal Ridge Construction, LLC
as 2:2025cv02033
Plaintiff:
Kip Flores Architects, LLC
Defendant:
Royal Ridge Construction, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
McClendon v. TuneCore Inc
as 4:2025cv00285
Plaintiff:
Juan McClendon
Defendant:
TuneCore Inc
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Brown v. Hicks
as 5:2025cv05063
Plaintiff:
Blake Brown
Defendant:
Josh Hicks doing business as Simba Seven LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Magee v. New Balance Athletics Inc
as 4:2025cv00265
Plaintiff:
Steven Magee
Defendant:
New Balance Athletics Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Matsumoto v. Sanusizheng LLC
as 4:2025cv00242
Plaintiff:
Shoichi Matsumoto
Defendant:
Sanusizheng LLC doing business as Chicot Hibachi North Hills
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Zito, LLC v. Stauffer Manufacturing Company
as 5:2025cv05036
Plaintiff:
Zito, LLC
Defendant:
Stauffer Manufacturing Company doing business as Stauffer Glove & Safety
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Luxottica Group SpA v. Quick Retail Services LLC et al
as 2:2025cv00014
Defendant:
Quick Retail Services LLC and Faraz Zameer
Plaintiff:
Luxottica Group SpA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
