District Court Cases in Arkansas
Cases 21 - 30 of 64,083
Hicks v. USA
as 4:2023cv00888
Petitioner:
Eric G Hicks
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Riemer v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 5:2023cv05161
Plaintiff:
Thomas Matthew Riemer
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service, Acting U.S. Marshal Mike Oglesby, Kara's Correctional Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Doe
as 4:2023cv00889
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott
Defendant:
Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Miller v. DeVore et al
as 4:2023cv00887
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ray Miller
Defendant:
DeVore, Lang, Buckner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hugunin v. Winmill
as 4:2023cv00886
Plaintiff:
Harvey William Hugunin
Defendant:
B Lynn Winmill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Hugunin v. Nye
as 4:2023cv00885
Plaintiff:
Harvey William Hugunin
Defendant:
David C Nye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Chi St. Vincent Hot Springs v. Johnson Controls, Inc. et al
as 6:2023cv06102
Plaintiff:
Chi St. Vincent Hot Springs
Defendant:
Johnson Controls, Inc. and Johnson Controls Fire Protection LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
McElroy v. Payne
as 4:2023cv04090
Plaintiff:
James McElroy
Respondent:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Houston v. Gunner et al
as 4:2023cv00892
Plaintiff:
Judrika Houston
Defendant:
DeLay Gunner, Daniel Shone and Cindy Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spencer v. Payne et al
as 4:2023cv00893
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Spencer
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, William F Straughn, Moses Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
