District Court Cases in Iowa
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,000
Awadallah v. Federal Courts
as 4:2026cv00389
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pedersen v. Youngblut et al
as 4:2026cv00388
Plaintiff:
Danielle Marie Pedersen
Defendant:
Brad Youngblut, John Doe and Des Moines Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. State of Iowa et al
as 4:2026cv00386
Plaintiff:
Darlene E. King
Defendant:
State of Iowa, Celene Fogarty, Lipman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Meyer v. United States of America
as 5:2026cv04086
Plaintiff:
Dereck Dominick Meyer
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00387
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in Habeas Corpus: INS
Arnold v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2026cv00383
Plaintiff:
Nathan Arnold
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00188
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wise v. Tama County, Iowa et al
as 1:2026cv00187
Plaintiff:
Tammy Wise
Defendant:
Tama County, Iowa, Curt Hilmer, Mark Doland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00385
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 2114 Wrongful Discharge from Employment - protection from discrimination
Wilbanks v. Davenport Police Department et al
as 4:2026cv00384
Plaintiff:
Winston R. Wilbanks
Defendant:
Davenport Police Department and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
