Eighth Circuit Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,000
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Nike
as 4:2026mc00128
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv03598
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Arabei v. Selby et al
as 4:2026cv03246
Plaintiff:
Angelina Vadimovna Arabei
Defendant:
Carrie M. Selby and United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
City of Warren General Retirement Health, Life and Disability Benefits Plan and Trust v. Pentair plc et al
as 0:2026cv03597
Plaintiff:
City of Warren General Retirement Health, Life and Disability Benefits Plan and Trust
Defendant:
Pentair plc, John L. Stauch, Nicholas J. Brazis and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Dokka v. Edlow et al
as 4:2026cv03244
Plaintiff:
Kartheek Kumar Dokka
Defendant:
Joseph Edlow and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
United States v. Adolph Lawrence
as 26-2591
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Adolph Akwe Lawrence
Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP v. Marty Jackley, et al
as 26-2597
Plaintiff:
Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP
Defendant:
Marty Jackley, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of South Dakota and Larry Deiter, in his official capacity as Director of the South Dakota Division of Insurance
Tracy Presson v. United States
as 26-2590
Petitioner:
Tracy Todd Presson
Respondent:
United States of America
United States v. Lah Langmi
as 26-2592
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Lah Nestor Langmi, also known as Langmi Nestor
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv02055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
