District Court Cases in Arkansas
Cases 1 - 10 of 65,308
Donerson v. Epic Games Inc et al
as 3:2024cv00041
Defendant:
Rockstar Games UK Ltd, Epic Games Inc, Activision Blizzard Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Kushanel Donerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Robinson v. Landerth et al
as 4:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
Kendrick A Robinson
Defendant:
G Landerth, P Vanlandingham, Lakita Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clowers v. Gilliam et al
as 4:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
Cameron David Clowers
Defendant:
Wade Gilliam, Saline County Detention Center and Taylor Beckwith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
Demetric Johnson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Lamar v. Dycus et al
as 4:2024cv00250
Plaintiff:
Anthony D Lamar
Defendant:
Donna Dycus, Jared Byers, Herbert Straughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv05066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Putney v. Huntsman et al
as 1:2024cv01021
Plaintiff:
Stedrick L Putney, Sr
Defendant:
Tad Huntsman, Frank Spain, Prosecuting Attorney Sandra Bradshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seadorf v. Damante et al
as 2:2024cv02035
Plaintiff:
Arthur William Seadorf, Sr.
Defendant:
Sheriff Jim Damante, Officer Jonathan Stroud and Booking Officer Reed Ingram
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Doe
as 6:2024cv06032
Plaintiff:
Joshua Terrell Bell
Defendant:
Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.