District Court Cases in Arkansas
Cases 31 - 40 of 66,997
Rain Dogs Trucking Inc v. Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores Inc
as 4:2024cv00993
Defendant:
Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores Inc
Plaintiff:
Rain Dogs Trucking Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage
Hubbard v. Witherington et al
as 4:2024cv00994
Defendant:
Carrie Clark, Kristy Witherington, Cable Thomas Parks and others
Plaintiff:
Lucas Michael Hubbard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Garner v. Garrett
as 2:2024cv00209
Plaintiff:
William Garner
Defendant:
Chad Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Evans v. Doe
as 4:2024cv00997
Plaintiff:
Sherrie Evans
Defendant:
Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cummings v. Arkansas Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2024cv00998
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Corrections, Cummins Unit and Gary Musselwhite
Plaintiff:
Joshua Dontae Cummings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terry v. Sims
as 4:2024cv00999
Defendant:
Sims
Plaintiff:
Jarell D Terry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hiley v. Knoedl et al
as 4:2024cv01000
Defendant:
Fordyce Police Department, Mike Knoedl and Jordan Ables
Plaintiff:
Adrian Lamar Hiley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00995
Plaintiff:
Tamara Hill
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Benton County Prosecuting Attorney's Office v. Lacy
as 5:2024mc00092
Petitioner:
Benton County Prosecuting Attorney's Office
Respondent:
Brandon Lacy
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Chambers v. Cantrell et al
as 5:2024cv05237
Plaintiff:
Devell Chambers
Defendant:
Deputy Murphy, Corporal Henson, Sheriff Jay Cantrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
