District Court Cases in Minnesota
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,000
Maczko v. ARB Gaming, LLC
as 0:2026cv03396
Plaintiff:
Peter Maczko
Defendant:
ARB Gaming, LLC doing business as Modo.us
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv03400
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Krueger v. Bisignano
as 0:2026cv03391
Plaintiff:
Loree Krueger
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Adams et al v. Wright County et al
as 0:2026cv03395
Plaintiff:
Winter Alexander Adams and A.J.A.
Defendant:
Wright County, Minnesota, Wendy Ryan, Kylie Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv03399
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Holloway v. Prudential Insurance Company of America, The
as 0:2026cv03389
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Holloway
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America, The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
United States of America v. Kim
as 0:2026cv03397
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Filmore Doyoon Kim
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4246 Petition to Determine Present Mental Condition of Imprisoned Person
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv03392
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv03393
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv03401
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
