West Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,858
Jaber v. McCoy
as 3:2024cv00124
Defendant:
Dr./Mat Emery McCoy
Plaintiff:
Faouzi Jaber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramirez Rodriguez v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00184
Respondent:
Warden
Petitioner:
Jose Miguel Ramirez Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Warren v. Tate et al
as 5:2024cv00185
Defendant:
Tara Moon, Officer Rice, Larry Pette and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Russell Warren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Belcher v. Cutwright et al
as 1:2024cv00500
Respondent:
Warden Cutwright and Acting Warden
Petitioner:
Rhonda Belcher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Young v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00498
Petitioner:
Tyrone Young
Respondent:
FCI Beckley Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Harris v. Holzapfel
as 5:2024cv00499
Petitioner:
Robert Andrew Harris
Respondent:
Warden Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Perez v. Holzapfel
as 5:2024cv00497
Respondent:
Warden Holzapfel
Petitioner:
Efrain Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Williams v. Ray
as 5:2024cv00183
Respondent:
H.L. Ray
Petitioner:
Brandon Monquee Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Neal v. Varien et al
as 3:2024cv00493
Defendant:
Magistrate Steve Tarbett, Magistrate Melanie Sang, Officer C. A. Varien and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Lee Neal, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Neal v. Western Regional Jail et al
as 3:2024cv00494
Defendant:
Steve Tarbett, Administrator Carl Aldridge, Kyle Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Lee Neal, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
