U.S. District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 6,229
Williams v. United States of America
as 3:2025cv00067
Petitioner:
Eugene Asomani Williams
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Persinger v. Yardley et al
as 5:2025cv00099
Plaintiff:
Roger Persinger and Zeyela M. Clendenin
Defendant:
Lance Yardley, Shelby Searls, Jason Goddard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conley v. Star
as 5:2025cv00096
Petitioner:
Pamela Kathryn Conley
Respondent:
Warden Star
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sterling v. Bayless
as 3:2025cv00065
Petitioner:
Franklyn Sterling
Respondent:
M. J. Bayless
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Galvan Sanchez v. Brown Warden
as 5:2025cv00095
Petitioner:
Marco Antonio Galvan Sanchez
Respondent:
R. Brown, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Moreno v. Brown
as 3:2025cv00064
Petitioner:
Jose Trinidad Moreno
Respondent:
R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Johnson v. Tibbs et al
as 5:2025cv00094
Plaintiff:
Mathis Eugene Johnson
Defendant:
Lt. Tibbs, US Marshals, Parkersburg Task Force and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Young v. USA
as 1:2025cv00041
Petitioner:
Cedric Pierre Young
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Cumberledge v. Starr
as 5:2025cv00092
Petitioner:
Todd Cumberledge
Respondent:
Warden Starr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Philmon v. Bayless
as 5:2025cv00093
Petitioner:
Kevin D. Philmon
Respondent:
M. J. Bayless
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
