US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 5,748
Hallman v. Lovett
as 5:2023cv00297
Petitioner:
Sharif Hallman
Respondent:
S. Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Makki v. Bayless
as 5:2023cv00299
Petitioner:
Mohamad Ali Makki
Respondent:
Melissa J. Bayless
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Waters v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv00300
Petitioner:
Gregory A. Waters
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Johnson v. Peters et al
as 5:2023cv00298
Plaintiff:
Dennis J. Johnson
Defendant:
Colette S. Peters, Warden R. Brown and Chaplain Hong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Lawhorn v. Mayle et al
as 3:2023cv00206
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lawhorn
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Patrick Mayle, Nurse Jane Doe and Nurse John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughn v. Ray
as 5:2023cv00296
Petitioner:
Teddy Vaughn
Respondent:
Ms. Heather Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Scott v. Brown
as 3:2023cv00203
Petitioner:
Robert V. Scott
Respondent:
R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Kelly v. Lovett
as 5:2023cv00295
Petitioner:
Christopher Kelly
Respondent:
Warden S. Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Milliron v. Ray
as 3:2023cv00204
Petitioner:
William B. Milliron
Respondent:
Miss Heather Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
