US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 5,224
Michael v. Bayliss
as 3:2022cv00162
Petitioner: Philip E. Michael, II
Respondent: Melissa Bayliss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Stewart v. Reichard et al
as 3:2022cv00163
Plaintiff: Brian Stewart
Defendant: Timothy Reichard, Michele Stewart, Rodney Alan Stewart, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell-Veney v. Searls
as 5:2022cv00232
Petitioner: Elan Bell-Veney
Respondent: Shelby Searls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clinton v. Groh et al
as 5:2022cv00230
Plaintiff: Gregory K. Clinton
Defendant: Gina M. Groh, Robert W. Trumble, Anna Krasinski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Tate
as 3:2022cv00160
Plaintiff: Jesse Colin Campbell
Defendant: Didymus Tate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Bayless
as 5:2022cv00227
Petitioner: Ruffin L. Parker
Respondent: N. Bayless
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Troutman v. Wolfe
as 5:2022cv00228
Petitioner: David S. Troutman
Respondent: Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Larry v. Wolfe
as 5:2022cv00225
Petitioner: Orlando Larry
Respondent: R. M. Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Dorsey v. Kroghan et al
as 3:2022cv00159
Plaintiff: Lamar Nashawn Dorsey
Defendant: Sgt. Kroghan and Correctional Officer West
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Warden, FCI Morgantown
as 5:2022cv00224
Petitioner: Thomas Reed
Respondent: Warden, FCI Morgantown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?