US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,584
Venneri v. Bayless
as 5:2022cv00242
Petitioner: Anthony Venneri
Respondent: M.J. Bayless
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Smith v. Ames
as 5:2022cv00235
Petitioner: John D. Smith
Respondent: Donnie Ames
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bell-Veney v. Searls
as 5:2022cv00232
Petitioner: Elan Bell-Veney
Respondent: Shelby Searls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael v. Bayliss
as 3:2022cv00162
Petitioner: Philip E. Michael, II
Respondent: Melissa Bayliss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Parker v. Bayless
as 5:2022cv00227
Petitioner: Ruffin L. Parker
Respondent: N. Bayless
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Troutman v. Wolfe
as 5:2022cv00228
Petitioner: David S. Troutman
Respondent: Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Larry v. Wolfe
as 5:2022cv00225
Petitioner: Orlando Larry
Respondent: R. M. Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Reed v. Warden, FCI Morgantown
as 5:2022cv00224
Petitioner: Thomas Reed
Respondent: Warden, FCI Morgantown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Richardson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2022cv00158
Petitioner: Theordore Richardson
Respondent: Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bartusek v. Bayless
as 5:2022cv00222
Petitioner: Michael Bartusek
Respondent: M.J. Bayless
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?