US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,094
Smith v. US
as 3:2024cv00093
Petitioner: Robert Smith
Respondent: US
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ruffin v. Bayless
as 5:2024cv00141
Petitioner: Christopher Ruffin
Respondent: Melissa Bayless
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jeter v. Warden, USP Hazelton
as 5:2024cv00139
Respondent: Warden, USP Hazelton
Petitioner: Jeffery Jeter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cupp v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00089
Petitioner: Steven Orville Cupp
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jones v. Warden, FCI Becley (sic)
as 3:2024cv00091
Respondent: Warden, FCI Becley (sic)
Petitioner: Charles W. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Kornegay v. Brown
as 5:2024cv00136
Petitioner: Raymond Kornegay
Respondent: (W) R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mohamed v. Warden, USPO Hazelton
as 5:2024cv00138
Respondent: Warden, USP Hazelton
Petitioner: Guled Mohamed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Riley v. Lovett et al
as 5:2024cv00135
Petitioner: Damien Woodrow Riley
Respondent: Steve Lovett and Warden Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Smith v. Ray
as 5:2024cv00131
Respondent: H.L. Ray
Petitioner: Jerry Charles Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Brown v. Ray
as 3:2024cv00085
Petitioner: Aquilla Brown
Respondent: H.L. Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?