US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 3,116
Hedrick v. Raliegh North Carolina P.D. et al
as 3:2024cv00077
Petitioner:
Micheal Hedrick
Respondent:
Raliegh North Carolina P.D. et al
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rivera-Garcia v. Bayless
as 3:2024cv00076
Respondent:
Melissa Bayless
Petitioner:
Christian Rivera-Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hollins v. FBOP et al
as 5:2024cv00118
Respondent:
J. Siclari, FBOP, Staff Witness Butt and others
Petitioner:
Kevin Dale Hollins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gray v. US Attorney General
as 5:2024cv00114
Respondent:
US Attorney General
Petitioner:
Joseph Scott Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MacColl v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00073
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
John C. MacColl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Benton v. Bayless
as 5:2024cv00112
Petitioner:
Juan Jose Benton
Respondent:
Melissa J. Bayless
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Aguon v. Rey
as 5:2024cv00107
Respondent:
F.C.I. Hazelton Warden Rey
Petitioner:
Robert Lee Aguon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ford v. Lovette
as 3:2024cv00068
Respondent:
Warden Lovette
Petitioner:
Dallas Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lott v. Ray
as 5:2024cv00104
Petitioner:
Darion D Lott
Respondent:
Warden Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Stutler v. Tate
as 5:2024cv00103
Petitioner:
Aric Jason Stutler
Respondent:
Ditmaus Tate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
