US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 3,116
Smith v. Ray
as 5:2024cv00131
Respondent:
H.L. Ray
Petitioner:
Jerry Charles Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Brown v. Ray
as 3:2024cv00085
Petitioner:
Aquilla Brown
Respondent:
H.L. Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Woods v. Ray
as 5:2024cv00130
Respondent:
Hazelton FCI Warden H. Ray
Petitioner:
Willie Perry Woods and Curtis Tate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Vira v. Carter
as 3:2024cv00084
Petitioner:
Arvind Vira
Respondent:
Anne Mary Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Davis v. Brown
as 3:2024cv00082
Petitioner:
Francis Curtis Davis and Abdul-Malik As-Salafi
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Johnson v. Warden Ray - FCC Hazelton
as 5:2024cv00126
Petitioner:
William Johnson
Respondent:
Warden Ray - FCC Hazelton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Freeman v. Ray
as 3:2024cv00080
Respondent:
Warden Ray
Petitioner:
Ronald Freeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Botsvynyuk v. Brown
as 3:2024cv00081
Petitioner:
Mykhaylo Botsvynyuk
Respondent:
Warden R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Piner v. Brown
as 5:2024cv00122
Petitioner:
RaSean James Piner
Respondent:
Warden Mr. R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jones v. United States of America et al
as 3:2024cv00079
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden of FCI Beckley
Petitioner:
Charles W. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
