Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 14,616
King v. Richmond City Jail Deputies
as 3:2025cv00509
Plaintiff:
Phillip King, Jr.
Defendant:
Richmond City Jail Deputies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waldron v. USP Big Sandy
as 7:2025cv00436
Plaintiff:
Rondell Waldron
Defendant:
USP Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Smith v. Wellington et al
as 7:2025cv00437
Plaintiff:
Lamel Lamont Smith
Defendant:
Ms. Wellington, Lt. Rigsby and D.O.C
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Helton et al
as 7:2025cv00438
Plaintiff:
Marshall Dale Jones
Defendant:
HSA Kayla Helton, Nurse Grizzle, Master Officer Garrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Hurlburt et al
as 7:2025cv00439
Plaintiff:
Marshall Dale Jones
Defendant:
Dr. Charles Hurlburt, FNP Crystal Large and Pharmacy Nurse Rosetta Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burke v. Commonwealth Of Virginia et al
as 7:2025cv00440
Plaintiff:
Sol-Damacus Burke
Defendant:
Commonwealth Of Virginia, Red Onion State Prison, David E. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richards v. Priest et al
as 7:2025cv00443
Plaintiff:
River Richards
Defendant:
Jim Priest, Dan Fueller, Dan Harding, 3rd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lester v. Wexford Health et al
as 7:2025cv00446
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Stewart Lester
Defendant:
Wexford Health, Crystal Large, Nurse Diane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parham v. Unknown
as 3:2025cv00505
Plaintiff:
Shyriq Parham
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sherman v. Sparks
as 3:2025cv00506
Plaintiff:
Robert Sherman
Defendant:
Program Director Leah Sparks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
