Fourth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 133,957
Ronald Sutherland, Jr. v. State of North Carolina
as 24-6378
Petitioner:
RONALD KEITH SUTHERLAND, JR.
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and WARDEN
Terrence Hammock v. Zowie Barnes
as 24-6375
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE EDWARD HAMMOCK, JR.
Defendant:
DR. ZOWIE BARNES, M.D., DIRECTOR GAIL WATTS, OFFICER J. SHERMAN and others
Gregory Green v. Jimmy Richardson, II
as 24-6379
Plaintiff:
GREGORY GREEN
Defendant:
JIMMY A. RICHARDSON, II, Fifteenth Circuit Solicitor and MICHAEL TRAVIS HYMAN, Assistant Solicitor, Horry County
Anthony Hoover v. Stephen Waddell
as 24-6376
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEON HOOVER
Defendant:
STEPHEN WADDELL, Warden IV sued in individual and official capacity, ROY A. COOPER, III, Governor sued in individual and official capacity, ELIZABETH N. STRICKLAND, State Asst. District Attorney sued in individual and official capacity and others
Moore v. USA
as 5:2024cv00234
Petitioner:
Edward Moore, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Clark v. USA
as 7:2024cv00363
Petitioner:
Jonathan Wayne Clark
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Yeats v. Dotson
as 3:2024cv00296
Petitioner:
Killian Yeats
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Snead v. Covington VA
as 7:2024cv00274
Plaintiff:
King Cedric Omar Snead
Defendant:
Covington VA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hammock v. Shellenberger et al
as 1:2024cv01202
Plaintiff:
Terrence Edward Hammock
Defendant:
Scott Shellenberger, States Attorney Michael Fuller and States Attorney Michelle Fuller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles v. USA
as 1:2024cv00125
Petitioner:
Roger Dale Charles, II
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
