Fourth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 133,980
Gilcrist v. Middleton et al
as 8:2024cv02507
Plaintiff:
ADwan Cortavius Gilcrist
Defendant:
Cameron Middleton, Greenwood Police Department, T.J. Chaudoin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Puller v. Garcia et al
as 3:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Toccara Y. Puller
Defendant:
Lt. Garcia and Lt. Howerton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Stein et al
as 5:2024hc02086
Petitioner:
Carlos Hernandez and Ra Saadi Lennox Hernandez El
Respondent:
Joshua H. Stein, Jamie Bullard and North Carolina Department of Adult Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Acuna v. Jastal et al
as 5:2024ct03097
Plaintiff:
Raymondo Acuna
Defendant:
Lt. M. Jastal and Officer Finley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hubbard v. Duffield Jail et al
as 7:2024cv00276
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Hubbard
Defendant:
Duffield Jail, Nurse B. Carroll and R.N.P. Audia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
De La Rosa-Tejeda v. Flemming
as 5:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Juan Manuel De La Rosa-Tejeda
Defendant:
CO Flemming
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2024cv00213
Petitioner:
Anthony Harris
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
JAMES v. WARDEN
as 5:2024cv00079
Petitioner:
Calvin James
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Thomas v. Dotson
as 1:2024cv00668
Petitioner:
Timothy James Thomas
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mumford v. Stancel et al
as 3:2024cv00300
Plaintiff:
Justin Mumford
Defendant:
Sgt. Stancel, Sgt. Copeland and Sgt. Israel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
