Fourth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 36,544
Murray v. Allendale Correctional Institution
as 4:2024cv02823
Petitioner:
Bryan Murray
Respondent:
Allendale Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coleman v. Holpzapfell
as 5:2024cv00229
Petitioner:
Stye Lamar Coleman
Respondent:
Holpzapfell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Noonsab v. State of N.C.
as 5:2024hc02090
Petitioner:
Somchai Noonsab
Respondent:
State of N.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez v. Stein et al
as 1:2024cv00367
Petitioner:
CARLOS HERNANDEZ and RA SAADI LENNOX HERNANDEZ EL
Respondent:
JOSHUA H. STEIN, JAMIE BULLARD and NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADULT CORRECTION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
AZAR EL v. CABARRUS COUNTY et al
as 1:2024cv00362
Petitioner:
RASHAUD HUSSEIN AZAR EL doing business as JERIMY LOVE
Respondent:
CABARRUS COUNTY, CABARRUS COUNTY JAIL, MIKE DOWNS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Denzel Chandler v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6413
Petitioner:
DENZEL JOSHUA CHANDLER
Respondent:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director
Todd Giffen v. Warden FMC Rochester
as 24-6406
Petitioner:
TODD MICHAEL GIFFEN
Respondent:
WARDEN FMC ROCHESTER
George Steen v. Todd Ishee
as 24-6409
Petitioner:
GEORGE MICHAEL STEEN
Respondent:
TODD E. ISHEE, Secretary of the Department of Adult Correction and BRETT BULLIS, Warden of Avery-Mitchell CI
Larry Tyler v. Director of the Darlington County Detention Center
as 24-6402
Petitioner:
LARRY JAMES TYLER
Respondent:
DIRECTOR OF THE DARLINGTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
Hernandez v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
Marco Hernandez
Defendant:
E. Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
