Fourth Circuit Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 585,898
PROGRESS FREIGHT LINES INC. v. New Wave International Cargo, LLC
as 5:2025cv00087
Plaintiff:
PROGRESS FREIGHT LINES INC.
Defendant:
New Wave International Cargo, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
PROGRESS FREIGHT LINES INC. v. New Wave International Cargo, LLC
as 5:2025cv00088
Plaintiff:
PROGRESS FREIGHT LINES INC.
Defendant:
New Wave International Cargo, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Macaulay v. United States of America
as 7:2025cv00366
Plaintiff:
Deborah Macaulay
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Cause Of Action: Camp Lejeune Justice Act of 2022
Flowers v. United States of America
as 7:2025cv00367
Plaintiff:
Michael H Flowers
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: Camp Lejeune Justice Act of 2022
Borden v. FMC Butner Warden
as 5:2025hc02042
Petitioner:
Jason Dean Borden
Respondent:
FMC Butner Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2025hc02041
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 5:2025cv00076
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 5:2025cv00077
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 5:2025cv00078
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 5:2025cv00079
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.