Fourth Circuit Other Statutes Cases

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 61,169
Cricket Communicatations, LLC v. Michael Scott
as 16-3051
Petitioner: CRICKET COMMUNICATATIONS, LLC
Respondent: MICHAEL A. SCOTT
Joaquin Carcano v. Patrick McCrory
as 16-1989
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOAQUIN CARCANO, PAYTON GREY MCGARRY, ANGELA GILMORE and others
Plaintiff: EQUALITY NORTH CAROLINA
Defendant - Appellee: PATRICK L. MCCRORY, in his official capacity, Governor of North Carolina, UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA, BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA and others
Defendant: ROY A. COOPER, III, in his official capacity, Attorney General of North Carolina
Intervenor/Defendant: SENATOR PHILLIP E. BERGER, REPRESENTATIVE TIM MOORE
Westmoreland Coal Company v. DOWCP
as 16-1990
Petitioner: WESTMORELAND COAL COMPANY
Respondent: DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, CALVIN R. CLYBURN
KO-ME, LLC v. Prince George's County, MD
as 16-1992
Plaintiff - Appellant: KO-ME, LLC, d/b/a Mile High Club, JOHN DOE, On Behalf of Themselves and All others Similarly Situated, JANE DOE, On Behalf of Themselves and All others Similarly Situated
Defendant - Appellee: PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND
Brian Clyburn v. Commissioner of IRS
as 16-1994
Petitioner - Appellant: BRIAN B. CLYBURN
Respondent - Appellee: COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
US v. George Thomas Cabel
as 16-7166
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: GEORGE THOMAS CABEL, a/k/a PY
In re: Awal Mohammed
as 16-3053
Movant: In re: AWAL MOHAMMED
:
In re: Mark Crenshaw
as 16-3054
Movant: In re: MARK KERRY CRENSHAW
:
US v. Joseph Webb
as 16-4540
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: JOSEPH D. WEBB
US v. Clarence Coakley
as 16-7165
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: CLARENCE D. COAKLEY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?