Fourth Circuit Other Statutes Cases

Environmental Matters Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,095
Living Lands, LLC et al v. Ward
as 3:2024cv00356
Plaintiff: Living Lands, LLC and D.C. Chapman Ventures, Inc.
Defendant: Harold Ward
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
Congaree Riverkeeper v. Shaw Industries Group, Inc.
as 3:2024cv03810
Plaintiff: Congaree Riverkeeper
Defendant: Shaw Industries Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
The County Commission of Fayette County, WV v. National Grid NE Holdings 2 LLC
as 24-1590
Plaintiff: FAYETTE COUNTY COMMISSION, a political subdivision of the State of West Virginia and ANTHONY CILIBERTI, Esq, Fayette County Prosecuting Attorney
Cross Plaintiff: ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY and COLUMBIA CASUALTY COMPANY
Defendant: NATIONAL GRID NE HOLDINGS 2 LLC, a Massachusetts Limited Liabilty Company, successor in interest to the remedial liabilities of Eastern Gas and Fuel Associates, TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, a Connecticut corporation successor in interest to, PARDEE AND CURTAIN REALTY LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company qualified to do business in West Virginia and others
Cross Defendant: NAVIGATORS INSURANCE COMPANY, ASSOCIATED ELECTRIC & GAS INSURANCE SERVICES, LTD, CENTURY INDEMNITY COMPANY, as successor to CCI Insurance Company, as successor to Insurance Company of North America, and as successor to CIGNA Specialty Insurance Company formerly known as California Union Insurance Company and others
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. United States Forest Service et al
as 5:2024cv00274
Plaintiff: Greenbrier River Watershed Association, Center for Biological Diversity, Appalachian Voices and others
Defendant: Jason Hattersley, United States Forest Service and Randy Moore
Intervenor: South Fork Coal Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Precon Development Corporation, Inc. v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
as 2:2024cv00337
Plaintiff: Precon Development Corporation, Inc.
Defendant: United States Army Corps of Engineers
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Defenders of Wildlife et al v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv00073
Defendant: Martha Williams, Brenda Mallory, United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Plaintiff: Sierra Club and Defenders of Wildlife
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Maryland Chapter of the Sierra Club v. Federal Highway Administration
as 24-1447
Plaintiff: NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES, FRIENDS OF MOSES HALL, NORTHERN VIRGINIA CITIZENS ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant: GREGORY MURRILL, in his official capacity as Maryland Division Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration, PAUL J. WIEDEFELD, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Maryland Department of Transportation, SHAILEN BHATT, in his official capacity as Acting Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration and others
Seneca County v. The United States of America
as 2:2024cv01789
Plaintiff: Seneca County
Defendant: The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Sierra Club et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00130
Plaintiff: Sierra Club, West Virginia Highlands Conservancy, Inc. and West Virginia Rivers Coalition, Inc.
Defendant: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Michael S. Regan and Adam Ortiz
Intervenor: West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection and West Virginia Coal Association
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
Village of Johnson City v. The United States of America
as 2:2024cv01216
Plaintiff: Village of Johnson City
Defendant: The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?