Wisconsin Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 4,578
Montgomery v. Baier et al
as 1:2025cv00669
Plaintiff:
Timothy V Montgomery
Defendant:
Baier, A DeGroot, RN Henning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Does
as 2:2025cv00668
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Christopher Jones, Jr
Defendant:
John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Roan et al
as 3:2025cv00365
Plaintiff:
Mark K. Anderson, Jr.
Defendant:
Chappell Roan, Harold Nale, Eilene Nale and others
Unknown:
GBCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beasley v. Xiong
as 2:2025cv00664
Plaintiff:
Shawn Beasley
Defendant:
Sunny Xiong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Annamalai, Annamalai v. Doe 1-25, John et al
as 3:2025cv00364
Plaintiff:
Annamalai Annamalai
Defendant:
John Doe 1-25, Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Morris v. Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2025cv00650
Plaintiff:
Michael D Morris
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Jane Doe, Jane and John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Race et al
as 2:2025cv00655
Plaintiff:
Mark A Jones
Defendant:
Sgt Race, Sgt Krueger, Capt Rosmarynoski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guiden v. WellPath et al
as 2:2025cv00657
Plaintiff:
Travis Guiden
Defendant:
WellPath, Medical Assistant, Dr Paulse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayfield v. Vaughn
as 2:2025cv00659
Plaintiff:
David Mayfield
Defendant:
CO Vaughn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roehl, Craig v. Castillo, Nicholas et al
as 3:2025cv00358
Plaintiff:
Craig Roehl
Defendant:
Dr. Nicholas Castillo and Tammy Maasen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
