Wisconsin Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 14,198
Ward v. Nichols et al
as 2:2024cv00489
Plaintiff:
Robert Jay Ward
Defendant:
CO Nichols, CO Marwitz and Lt Fisher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Ostrowski et al
as 2:2024cv00492
Plaintiff:
Robert Wayne Harris
Defendant:
Deputy Jacob Ostrowski, Shawano County Sheriff's Department, Sheriff George Lenzer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young, Howard v. Beavais, Chad et al
as 3:2024cv00266
Plaintiff:
Howard Lee Young, Ebboni Young and Ebboni Howard Young
Defendant:
Lt. Chad Beavais, Lt. Paul Rosenthal, Lt. Eric Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abt, Gary v. Johnson, D. et al
as 3:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
Gary P. Abt
Defendant:
D. Johnson, Jenna L. Parks and Chris Buesgen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez v. Tegels
as 2:2024cv00483
Petitioner:
Roberto I Lopez
Respondent:
Warden Lizzie Tegels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Raney v. Goehl et al
as 2:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
Adam Raney
Defendant:
Officer Goehl, Officer Wodak, Ashley Haseleu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Crisci
as 2:2024cv00486
Plaintiff:
David J Thompson
Defendant:
CO Crisci
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Bailey et al
as 2:2024cv00476
Plaintiff:
Remo Harrison Daniels and Remo H Daniels
Defendant:
Jerome G Bailey, Sgt Nelson, CO Pach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kinikin, Jeremiah v. Tank
as 3:2024cv00263
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah N. Kinikin
Defendant:
C.O. Tank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carpenter, Ronald v. Cromwell, Dan
as 3:2024cv00261
Petitioner:
Ronald Marion Carpenter
Respondent:
Dan Cromwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
