Wisconsin Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,857
It v. State of Wisconsin
as 2:2025cv00598
Petitioner:
Anthony K It
Respondent:
State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia, Sergio v. Emmerich, E.
as 3:2025cv00323
Petitioner:
Sergio Garcia
Respondent:
Warden E. Emmerich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Chiquito Pinargote, Jose v. Oxford's Warden
as 3:2025cv00321
Petitioner:
Jose Chiquito Pinargote
Respondent:
Oxford's Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sanders v. Smith
as 2:2025cv00578
Petitioner:
Quordalis V Sanders
Respondent:
Tory Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Porter v. Michel et al
as 2:2025cv00567
Petitioner:
James Andrew Porter, Jr
Respondent:
Heidi Michel and Sheriff Todd Delain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Miller v. Jaeger
as 2:2025cv00563
Petitioner:
Chad Miller
Respondent:
Peter Jaeger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Leequane v. Garceau
as 2:2025cv00544
Petitioner:
Leequane McGowan
Respondent:
Kevin Garceau
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis, Stephen v. Van Rybroek, Greg
as 3:2025cv00290
Petitioner:
Stephen Matthew Davis
Respondent:
Greg Van Rybroek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ramon, Fabela v. Federal Bureau of Prisons FCI Oxford
as 3:2025cv00291
Petitioner:
Fabela Ramon
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons FCI Oxford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mota-Cordones, Henri v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
as 3:2025cv00295
Petitioner:
Henri Mota-Cordones
Respondent:
Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
