Wisconsin Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,605
Brown, Robert v. State of Wisconsin
as 3:2024cv00281
Petitioner:
Robert L. Brown
Respondent:
State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Frazier, James v. The United States of America
as 3:2024cv00272
Petitioner:
James V. Frazier
Respondent:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Lopez v. Tegels
as 2:2024cv00483
Petitioner:
Roberto I Lopez
Respondent:
Warden Lizzie Tegels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carpenter, Ronald v. Cromwell, Dan
as 3:2024cv00261
Petitioner:
Ronald Marion Carpenter
Respondent:
Dan Cromwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Puchner v. Maxwell et al
as 2:2024cv00478
Petitioner:
John D Puchner
Respondent:
Mike Maxwell, Lisa Neubauer, Eric Severson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
May v. McDermott
as 2:2024cv00450
Petitioner:
Edith Mae May
Respondent:
Jennifer McDermott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hauke, Joseph v. State of Wisconsin
as 3:2024cv00233
Petitioner:
Joseph J. Hauke
Defendant:
Gregory A. Parker, Mathew Kolell, Chris Madle and others
Respondent:
State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Alvarado v. Hepp
as 2:2024cv00421
Petitioner:
Ramon Alvarado, Jr
Respondent:
Randall Hepp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lopez, Ted v. Tegels, Lizzie
as 3:2024cv00223
Petitioner:
Ted Lopez
Respondent:
Lizzie Tegels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lush, Stephen v. Van Rybroek, Gregory
as 3:2024cv00243
Petitioner:
Stephen Lush
Respondent:
Gregory Van Rybroek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
