Wisconsin Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 3,605
Annamalai, Annamalai v. Emmerich, Warden
as 3:2024cv00132
Petitioner:
Annamalai Annamalai
Respondent:
Warden Emmerich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hughes v. McDermott
as 2:2024cv00270
Petitioner:
Etter L Hughes
Respondent:
Warden Jennifer McDermott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Knutson, Jeremy v. State of Wisconsin
as 3:2024cv00126
Petitioner:
Jeremy Knutson
Respondent:
State of Wisconsin and George Lenzner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mayberry, Bobby v. Kaul, Josh
as 3:2024cv00118
Petitioner:
Bobby F. Mayberry, Jr.
Respondent:
Josh Kaul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shaw, Antonio v. Buesgen, Chris
as 3:2024cv00119
Petitioner:
Antonio P. Shaw, Jr.
Respondent:
Chris Buesgen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Meisner
as 2:2024cv00236
Petitioner:
Charles Brown
Respondent:
Warden Michael Meisner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Recla, Adam v. Curtis, Jeremiah et al
as 3:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Adam Recla
Defendant:
Jeremiah Curtis, Derrick June and Adam Marciulionis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinney v. Gierach et al
as 2:2024cv00206
Petitioner:
William McKinney
Respondent:
Warden Cromwell, Greg Giese, Angela Hansen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yefferson v. Warden FCI Oxford
as 3:2024cv00093
Petitioner:
Juan Luis Yefferson
Respondent:
Warden FCI Oxford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wingers v. Suter
as 2:2024cv00195
Petitioner:
Dean J Wingers
Respondent:
Christine Suter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
