Seventh Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 35,525
MARTIN v. BRIDGES et al
as 1:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
MARK L. MARTIN, II
Defendant:
CHARLES BRIDGES, MICHAEL CECIL, BRENDA FELIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUNG v. RUSSELL et al
as 2:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
MARION LEE YOUNG, I
Defendant:
WENDY RUSSELL, M. KOLHOUSE and KNOX CO. JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Love v. Rhode et al
as 1:2024cv00328
Plaintiff:
Da Vonte Love
Defendant:
Mr CO Rhode and Kevin Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phelps v. Smith et al
as 3:2024cv03068
Plaintiff:
Jermaine M Phelps
Defendant:
. Smith, Mount Sterling Correctional Facility and ERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Profit v. Tuell et al
as 3:2024cv50102
Plaintiff:
Shaun Profit
Defendant:
Susan Tuell, Merrill Zahtz, Larry Sy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitmore v. Davis et al
as 1:2024cv02136
Plaintiff:
Troy D. Whitmore
Defendant:
Ronald L. Davis, Michael Downey, Kolitwenzew and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
SCOTT v. KALLIS et al
as 2:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
LUKE JOHN SCOTT, SR.
Defendant:
S. KALLIS, WOLF and DIRECTOR OF THE DEPT. OF JUSTICE OF THE UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Torres v. Racine Correctional Institution
as 2:2024cv00325
Plaintiff:
Francisco Torres
Defendant:
Racine Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Dearmond et al
as 3:2024cv00734
Plaintiff:
Dennis Thompson
Defendant:
Alisa Dearmond, Anthony Wills, Angela Crain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Myles v. Wexford et al
as 3:2024cv00728
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Myles
Defendant:
Wexford, Dr. Becker, Phil Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.