Seventh Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 100,279
Ausby v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv00758
Plaintiff:
Emerald Ausby
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Anthony Wills, Tonya Knust and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McFadden v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv00760
Plaintiff:
Lavarius McFadden
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Anthony Willis, Tonya Knust and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Wills et al
as 3:2024cv00762
Plaintiff:
Mikal Hall
Defendant:
Anthony Wills, Latoya Hughes, Kelly Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. BRIDGES et al
as 1:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
MARK L. MARTIN, II
Defendant:
CHARLES BRIDGES, MICHAEL CECIL, BRENDA FELIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUNG v. RUSSELL et al
as 2:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
MARION LEE YOUNG, I
Defendant:
WENDY RUSSELL, M. KOLHOUSE and KNOX CO. JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Love v. Rhode et al
as 1:2024cv00328
Plaintiff:
Da Vonte Love
Defendant:
Mr CO Rhode and Kevin Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bass v. Battle et al
as 3:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Deandre Rashawn Bass
Defendant:
Battle, Pullins and Cornett
Not Yet Classified:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv00761
Plaintiff:
Eric Smith
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Anthony Wills, Tonya Knust and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOOD v. PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2024cv00479
Petitioner:
DERRICK HOOD, JR.
Respondent:
PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Phelps v. Smith et al
as 3:2024cv03068
Plaintiff:
Jermaine M Phelps
Defendant:
. Smith, Mount Sterling Correctional Facility and ERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.