Seventh Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 27,655
Hernandez v. Green
as 1:2025cv01114
Petitioner:
David Hernandez
Respondent:
Brittany Green
Unknown:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Poon v. Lillard et al
as 3:2025cv00378
Petitioner:
Susan H. Poon
Respondent:
Lillard and Vong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. Jones
as 1:2025cv01109
Petitioner:
Mark Jones
Respondent:
Chance Jones
Unknown:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ALLEN v. WARDEN
as 3:2025cv00061
Petitioner:
DAVID JOSEPH ALLEN
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ALLEN v. WARDEN
as 3:2025cv00062
Petitioner:
DAVID JOSEPH ALLEN
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Lammer
as 3:2025cv50126
Petitioner:
Troy C. Lewis
Respondent:
Warden Lammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
STIGLEMAN et al v. VANIHEL
as 2:2025cv00145
Petitioner:
TODD STIGLEMAN and CAROL KEIHN
Respondent:
FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
STIGLEMAN et al v. VANIHEL
as 2:2025cv00146
Petitioner:
TODD STIGLEMAN and CAROL KEIHN
Respondent:
FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Koeckeritz, Austin v. Peterson, James
as 3:2025cv00211
Petitioner:
Austin Koeckeritz
Respondent:
Judge James D. Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hernandez-Martinez v. Lammer et al
as 3:2025cv50124
Petitioner:
Shair Hernandez-Martinez
Respondent:
Warden B. Lammer and U.S. of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
