Seventh Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 35,930
WALTERS v. HARRINGTON et al
as 1:2024cv00776
Plaintiff:
LANCE W. WALTERS
Defendant:
HARRINGTON, MARION COUNTY SHERRIFF'S DEPT., KERRY FORRESTAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. FORRESTAL et al
as 1:2024cv00788
Plaintiff:
JOHN ERIC THOMAS
Defendant:
KERRY J. FORRESTAL, PAIGE WHITE and GINA WHITE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael S. Gorbey v. Lieutenant Forren, et al
as 24-1786
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT FORREN, NURSE TILLEY, NURSE KING and others
LONG v. LUNSFORD et al
as 1:2024cv00780
Plaintiff:
JOHN LONG
Defendant:
LUNSFORD, GILBERT, GEO GROUP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Carle Health Methodist Hospital
as 1:2024cv01177
Plaintiff:
Keith Lynell Clark
Defendant:
Carle Health Methodist Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Annis v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00549
Plaintiff:
Jay Michael Annis
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections, Kevin A Carr, Jared Hoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Utter et al
as 2:2024cv00553
Plaintiff:
Jerome Walker
Defendant:
H Utter, G Trzebiatowski, C Baier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COOKE v. MILLER et al
as 4:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
SAMANTHA COOKE
Defendant:
SHERIFF BRENT MILLER, CHIEF DEPUTY BRADLEY SHEPHERD, JAIL COMMANDER BRADLEY SEACAT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rico Sanders v. Tony Evers, et al
as 24-1774
Plaintiff:
RICO SANDERS
Defendant:
TONY EVERS, KEVIN CARR and JANE OR JOHN DOE
MAYBERRY v. EMMERSON et al
as 1:2024cv00768
Plaintiff:
JOSH MAYBERRY
Defendant:
DONALD EMMERSON, LPN, NP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
