Illinois Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 19,854
Richmond v. CTO Faberiola et al
as 1:2024cv06411
Defendant:
FAB and CTO Faberiola
Plaintiff:
Rashad K. Richmond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beasley v. Spears et al
as 1:2024cv01256
Plaintiff:
Shiloe Beasley
Defendant:
Robert M Spears and Office of the Circuit Clerk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Springfield Police Department et al
as 3:2024cv03203
Defendant:
Unknown Police Officer, Springfield Police Department and Kenneth Scarlette
Plaintiff:
Austin Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Townsend v. Vaughn et al
as 3:2024cv01758
Defendant:
John Doe 1, Laresha D. Reed, Mr. Gouche and others
Plaintiff:
Joeseph Townsend
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Napp et al
as 3:2024cv01766
Plaintiff:
Willie L. Carter
Defendant:
Morgan Hudson, Madison County Circuit Court and Kyle Napp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lipscomb v. Wills et al
as 3:2024cv01759
Defendant:
Anthony Wills, Q Baker and E Nickelson
Plaintiff:
Keon V Lipscomb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Myers v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv01763
Defendant:
Dr Myers, Latoya Hughes, Wexford and others
Plaintiff:
Angelo Myers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nichols v. Martinez et al
as 3:2024cv01762
Defendant:
Jefferson, Joshua Schoenbeck, John 1 Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Craig Nichols
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lipscomb v. Wills et al
as 3:2024cv01761
Defendant:
Quinnton Bent and Anthony Wills
Plaintiff:
Keon Lipscomb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Black v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv01258
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Tremel Black
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
