Illinois Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 45,096
Johnson v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv06439
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Reggie Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Richmond v. CTO Faberiola et al
as 1:2024cv06411
Defendant:
FAB and CTO Faberiola
Plaintiff:
Rashad K. Richmond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lynon v. Hughes et al
as 1:2024cv06286
Respondent:
Latoya Hughes, Sarah Brown-Foiles and Enaite Akpore
Petitioner:
Eric Lynon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Griffin v. Jones
as 1:2024cv01260
Petitioner:
Keith Griffin
Respondent:
Chance Jones
Unknown:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Beasley v. Spears et al
as 1:2024cv01256
Plaintiff:
Shiloe Beasley
Defendant:
Robert M Spears and Office of the Circuit Clerk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Springfield Police Department et al
as 3:2024cv03203
Defendant:
Unknown Police Officer, Springfield Police Department and Kenneth Scarlette
Plaintiff:
Austin Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Peoria Courthouse
as 4:2024cv04135
Plaintiff:
Clarence Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Peoria Courthouse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Gaetz et al
as 3:2024cv01764
Defendant:
Lewey, C/O Kiefer, C/O Childers and others
Plaintiff:
Mikal Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lipscomb v. Wills et al
as 3:2024cv01760
Defendant:
Anthony Wills and Officer Connor
Plaintiff:
Keon V. Lipscomb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Townsend v. Vaughn et al
as 3:2024cv01758
Defendant:
John Doe 1, Laresha D. Reed, Mr. Gouche and others
Plaintiff:
Joeseph Townsend
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
