US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 23,939
Johnson v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv06439
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Reggie Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Richmond v. CTO Faberiola et al
as 1:2024cv06411
Defendant:
FAB and CTO Faberiola
Plaintiff:
Rashad K. Richmond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lynon v. Hughes et al
as 1:2024cv06286
Respondent:
Latoya Hughes, Sarah Brown-Foiles and Enaite Akpore
Petitioner:
Eric Lynon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Britten v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv50313
Defendant:
Mindi Nurse, Latoya Hughes, Andrea Tack and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence Britten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Rodriguez et al
as 3:2024cv50314
Defendant:
Aroyal, Raviden, Tarry Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpson v. Nurse
as 1:2024cv06217
Respondent:
Mindi Nurse
Petitioner:
Brice Simpson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. Stakem et al
as 1:2024cv06291
Plaintiff:
Donald Wilson, Jr.
Defendant:
Mark D. Stakem and The Illinois Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Beck v. Cook County et al
as 1:2024cv06293
Defendant:
E. Cortez, Cook County, J. Quezada and others
Plaintiff:
Anterius Beck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Myers et al
as 1:2024cv06166
Defendant:
Dart, Myers, McCray and others
Plaintiff:
Chet Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beal v. McDonald et al
as 1:2024cv06203
Defendant:
Lieutenant Syehla, ERT Fredrick, ERT Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Demetrius A Beal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
