US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 23,941
Szpila v. Warden
as 1:2024cv05778
Defendant:
Warden
Plaintiff:
Rhyian Szpila
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guardiola v. Truitt et al
as 1:2024cv05861
Respondent:
Charles Truitt
Petitioner:
Gabriel Guardiola
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hayes v. Pitman et al
as 1:2024cv05866
Defendant:
Michael M. Pitman
Plaintiff:
Earnest Hayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Redd v. King et al
as 3:2024cv50281
Defendant:
Anthony Boyd, Andrew Sullivan, Kelly King and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Redd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodard v. Fernandez et al
as 3:2024cv50283
Defendant:
Lexis Law Legal App., Lisa Fernandez, Appellant Court Clerk/Court Reporter and others
Plaintiff:
Walter Woodard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnold III v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv05871
Defendant:
Cook County Sheriff's Office, Thomas J. Dart and Cook County Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Eugene Nathaniel Arnold III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Sonny et al
as 1:2024cv05805
Defendant:
Rocco, Supv. Fenderson, Cook County IL and others
Plaintiff:
Chet Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bush v. Lammer
as 3:2024cv50282
Respondent:
Warden B. Lammer
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Bush
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Rodas v. Lammer et al
as 3:2024cv50277
Petitioner:
Mario Rodas
Respondent:
Warden Brian Lammer and Education Supervisor P. Woolston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Potts v. Dir, Illinois Dept of Corr et al
as 1:2024cv05772
Respondent:
Dir, Illinois Dept of Corr
Petitioner:
Reginald Potts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
