District Court Cases in Kentucky
Cases 1 - 10 of 57,356
Barlow v. NCMIC Insurance Company
as 3:2023cv00500
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Barlow
Defendant:
NCMIC Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00499
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Church v. Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership
as 5:2023cv00265
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Church
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Bass v. City of Covington et al
as 2:2023cv00127
Plaintiff:
Brett Bass
Defendant:
City of Covington, Nicholas Hancock and Zachary Stayton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barton et al v. Kusnezov et al
as 7:2023cv00076
Plaintiff:
Terry L. Barton and Barbara Gayle Barton
Defendant:
Nicholas A. Kusnezov, M.D., Kenneth J. Koval, M.D., William Dreibelbis, PA-C and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Medical Malpractice
Melton et al v. Minnesota Life Insurance et al
as 6:2023cv00174
Executor:
Crystal Melton
Defendant:
Minnesota Life Insurance and Jamey Wooten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Swaminathan v. Fitchie
as 3:2023cv00497
Plaintiff:
Victor Swaminathan
Defendant:
Tyler Fitchie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Thomas v. Bailey et al
as 3:2023cv00494
Plaintiff:
Kevin O. Thomas
Defendant:
Brandon Bailey and A1 Porta Potty LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00492
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 nr Notice of Removal
Waltz v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00121
Plaintiff:
David Craig Waltz, III
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
