Kentucky Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 11,863
Jenkins v. Valentine
as 4:2022cv00161
Petitioner: David Alan Jenkins
Respondent: Anna Valentine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stratton v. LeMaster
as 0:2022cv00102
Petitioner: Charles Michael Stratton
Respondent: David LeMaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bare v. USA
as 2:2022cv00142
Petitioner: Wesley Michael Bare
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Fenwick v. Hempfling
as 4:2022cv00159
Plaintiff: Jonathon Andrew Fenwick
Defendant: Christopher Hempfling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cates v. Henderson County Detention Center et al
as 4:2022cv00160
Plaintiff: Austin Tyler Cates
Defendant: Henderson County Detention Center, Col. Gibson, Officer Shumate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez v. Gilley
as 6:2022cv00218
Petitioner: Anthony Lopez
Respondent: J. Gilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Toney v. LeMaster
as 0:2022cv00101
Petitioner: Clarence Toney, III
Respondent: Mr. LeMaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cole v. Hendricks et al
as 1:2022cv00158
Plaintiff: Joshua A. Cole
Defendant: Judge Joe Hendricks, Benny Kinney, Logan County District Probation Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Sumner et al
as 6:2022cv00216
Plaintiff: Ronald E. Smith
Defendant: Stephanie Sumner, Lawson and Carrie Cunnagin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Torres v. Joyner
as 7:2022cv00111
Petitioner: Javier Eduardo Torres
Respondent: Hector Joyner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?