US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 7,581
Denny v. Hawkens et al
as 5:2024cv00195
Defendant:
Patrick Hawkens and Kentucky Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Freeman V. Denny
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Medley v. Davis
as 5:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Ian Michael Medley
Defendant:
P. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Silverburg v. Moss et al
as 5:2024cv00191
Defendant:
Chesley Woodrum, Harvey Cloyd, Adam T Moss and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph L Silverburg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthews v. Paul, Warden et al
as 5:2024cv00192
Defendant:
Michael Broughton, Greg Gilbert, Timothy Terrell and others
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Matthews and Jermaine Izell Maurice McMatthews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perryman v. Warden, FCI Ashland
as 0:2024cv00072
Petitioner:
Michael Perryman
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Ashland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sneed v. Little Sandy Correctional Complex
as 0:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Robert Edward Sneed
Defendant:
Little Sandy Correctional Segregation Complex, Department of Corrections and Little Sandy Correctional Complex
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McQuiston v. Lovett
as 6:2024cv00102
Petitioner:
Dale Conrad McQuiston
Respondent:
Warden S. Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lombardi v. USA
as 6:2024cv00101
Defendant:
USA
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Lombardi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Upshaw v. USA
as 2:2024cv00117
Petitioner:
Keith L. Upshaw
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Winchell v. Green et al
as 0:2024cv00070
Defendant:
Julian Rye, Tracy Keeton, William Caudill and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Lee Winchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
