US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,330
Price v. Swaney et al
as 6:2023cv00171
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Price
Defendant:
G. Swaney, John Doe and USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortega v. Adkins et al
as 5:2023cv00255
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Ortega
Defendant:
Jessica Adkins and Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Civil Rights - Bivens Action
Pierce v. LeMaster
as 0:2023cv00086
Petitioner:
David L. Pierce
Respondent:
Warden David LeMaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hoskins v. Dutcher et al
as 6:2023cv00167
Plaintiff:
Kennie Hoskins
Defendant:
Robert Dutcher, Matthew Halcomb, Erica Brock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Brewer
as 7:2023cv00071
Petitioner:
Sammy Garcia
Respondent:
David Brewer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Brooks v. Brewer
as 7:2023cv00067
Petitioner:
Michael Brooks
Respondent:
David Brewer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bradley v. Gomez et al
as 6:2023cv00149
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee Bradley, Jr.
Defendant:
Christopher Gomez, Brandon Perry, Patti Ann Land and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Davila v. USP Big Sandy
as 7:2023cv00061
Petitioner:
Christopher James Davila
Respondent:
USP Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Garcia v. Brewer
as 7:2023cv00055
Petitioner:
Sammy Garcia
Respondent:
David Brewer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McLaughlin v. USP Big Sandy et al
as 7:2023cv00052
Plaintiff:
Brooke Aaron McLaughlin
Defendant:
USP Big Sandy, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Agent Parr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
