Winchell v. Green et al
Plaintiff: Justin Lee Winchell
Defendant: Julian Rye, Tracy Keeton, William Caudill and Lt. Nathan Elam
Case Number: 0:2024cv00070
Filed: July 16, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: David L Bunning
Referring Judge: P SO
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 26, 2024 Filing 9 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT to Office of Legal Services, KDOC re Order. (JLS)
August 15, 2024 CLERK'S VIRTUAL NOTICE TO Winchell re #8 Letter : The copies requested require a fee of 50 cents per page to be paid in advance. The total pages requested is 18 and the amount due is $9.00. Please make your check or money order payable to Clerk, United States District Court. cc: Winchell by US Mail (KSS)
August 14, 2024 Filing 8 Letter from Justin Lee Winchell, pro se, with envelope postmarked 8/8/24 re copy of complaint (KSS)
August 13, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER : the court DISMISSES with prejudice Warden Green and he is DISMISSED as a party to this action; 2) the Court DIRECTS the Clerk to complete 4 AO Form 398 and 4 AO Form 399 addressed to the Kentucky Dept of Correction on behalf of Keeton, Rye, Elam and Caudill; 3) the clerk shall send by certified mail, 4 copies of the Complaint #1 along with this order and the AO Forms to Office of Legal Services, KDOC, 275 East Main St., P.O. Box 2400, Frankfort, KY 40602-2400; 4) w/i 45 days of receipt of the documents, the Office SHALL complete and file the AO Form 399 for each deft who waives formal service. Each deft shall have 60 days to file an answer or response to the #1 Complaint; 5) for the defts who do not waive service, w/i 45 days the office SHALL file EXPARTE and UNDER SEAL, his or her last known address. USMS shall personally serve each deft and they shall have nlt 21 days to answer.. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 8/13/24.(JLS)cc: COR and Justin Lee Winchell by US Mail, KDOC by certified mail w/enclosures Modified on 8/15/2024 (JLS).
August 13, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: 1) Winchell's #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis IS GRANTED; 2) the Court WAIVES the $55 admin fee; 3) the clerk shall open an account in Winchell's name and send him a completed Form EDKY 525, and send a copy of the notice and this order to the Warden; 4) the Court DEFERS collection of the initial partial filing fee; 5) Winchell's custodian shall send payment each month equal to 20% of the preceding month's balance but only if that amount exceeds $10 until the entire $350 is paid. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 8/13/24. (JLS)cc: CORand Justin Lee Winchell, w/forms by US Mail
July 16, 2024 Filing 5 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample Caption)(KSS)
July 16, 2024 Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Justin Lee Winchell, pro se. (KSS)
July 16, 2024 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Justin Lee Winchell, pro seMotions referred to P SO. (KSS)
July 16, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT 5 summonses presented referred to PSO, filed by Justin Lee Winchell, pro se. (Attachments: #1 Proposed summons, #2 Envelope (no postmark))(KSS)
July 16, 2024 ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: #1 Complaint (Referred) (KSS)
July 16, 2024 Conflict Check run. (KSS)
July 16, 2024 ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: re #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Justin Lee Winchell (KSS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Winchell v. Green et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Julian Rye
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tracy Keeton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William Caudill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lt. Nathan Elam
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Justin Lee Winchell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?