Eastern District of Kentucky Cases

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 18,240
Daniels v. Bates et al
as 5:2015cv00156
Plaintiff: John Larry Daniels
Defendant: Johnny Bates, Duncan Kendall, Steve Haney
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Emrit v. Humana, Inc. et al
as 5:2015cv00155
Petitioner: Ronald Satish Emrit
Respondent: Humana, Inc., Pfizer, Inc., Accessrx.com and others
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question
Drury Properties, LLC v. Flora et al
as 5:2015cv00153
Plaintiff: Drury Properties, LLC
Defendant: Gary Flora
Trustee: Gary Flora
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Fraud
Houghton v. Heart et al
as 6:2015cv00092
Plaintiff: Lawerence Houghton
Defendant: Earl Heart, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Stapleton v. Big Run Coal and Clay Company, Inc., et al
as 0:2015cv00034
Plaintiff: Randy Stapleton
Defendant: Big Run Coal and Clay Company, Inc., River Cities Disposal, LLC, CSX Transporation, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal
Baker v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 5:2015cv00151
Plaintiff: Robert Baker
Defendant: Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Glover El v. Sepank
as 7:2015cv00041
Petitioner: Lonnell Glover El
Respondent: Michael Sepank
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Arnott v. Ashland Hospital Corporation d/b/a King's Daughters Medical Center
as 0:2015cv00032
Plaintiff: Anthony Todd Arnott
Defendant: Ashland Hospital Corporation d/b/a King's Daughters Medical Center
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Brichetto v. Sepanek
as 7:2015cv00042
Petitioner: Thomas P. Brichetto, Jr.
Respondent: M. Sepanek
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jackson v. SSA
as 6:2015cv00089
Plaintiff: Stacey Q. Jackson
Defendant: Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
1 2 3 4 5 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.