Eastern District of Kentucky Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 4,900
Chambers v. Sepanek et al
as 7:2017cv00146
Cause Of Action: Federal Question: Bivens Act
Evans et al v. Kentucky Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2017cv00251
Plaintiff: Buddy Evans, Richard Cardwell, Daniel A. Smith
Defendant: Kentucky Department of Corrections, Keith Helton, Eddie Payne and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. Smith
as 0:2017cv00100
Petitioner: William Henry Turner
Respondent: Thomas Smith
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Duvall v. Smith
as 0:2017cv00099
Petitioner: Duane A. Duvall
Respondent: Thomas Smith
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Patterson v. United States Parole Commission
as 6:2017cv00243
Petitioner: James R. Patterson
Respondent: United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Duvall v. Smith
as 0:2017cv00095
Petitioner: Duane A. Duvall
Respondent: Thomas B. Smith
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Fenske v. FCI Ashland Warden et al
as 0:2017cv00096
Petitioner: Thomas Fenske
Respondent: FCI Ashland Warden, FCI Morgantown Warden
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gilbert-Bey v. Kane et al
as 0:2017cv00097
Petitioner: Reginald Thaddeus Gilbert-Bey
Respondent: Tim Kane, Bureau of Prisons, Thomas B. Smith
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dishman et al v. Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 0:2017cv00098
Plaintiff: Kelly Dishman , A. D.
Defendant: Commonwealth of Kentucky, Kentucky Justice and Public Safety Cabinet, Kentucky Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Hackley v. Ormond
as 6:2017cv00242
Petitioner: Wilbert E. Hackley
Respondent: J. Ray Ormond
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?