Aker v. City of Dayton et al
| Octavian Aker |
| City of Dayton and Cassie Patterson |
| 2:2024cv00083 |
| May 14, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| David L Bunning |
| Candace J Smith |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
STANDING REFERRAL ORDER: 1) Case referred to assigned U.S. Magistrate Judge at Covington to supervise discovery and pretrial proceedings; 2) Magistrate Judge is authorized to conduct all pretrial and status conferences, to hold such hearings as may be required, and to rule on nondispositive motions, except motions in limine. Dispositive motions and motions in limine will be referred by the Clerk of this court to the undersigned. The final pretrial conference and trial will also be before the undersigned, unless parties agree to a trial by a Magistrate Judge; 3) Discovery disputes shall be resolved in the following manner: (1) Parties to meet/confer in an attempt to resolve disputes; (2) If parties unable to resolve such disputes formally, they shall attempt to resolve their disagreements by telephone conference with the Magistrate Judge; 3) If parties unable to resolve their disputes after conference with the Magistrate Judge, they may file appropriate written motions with the Court, which shall include the certification required. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 1/13/2011.(TBB)cc: COR
|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to City of Dayton and Cassie Patterson. Returned to counsel electronically for service. (Attachments: #1 Summons Patterson)(TBB) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO ATTORNEY Sean P. Callan by Clerk re: L.R. 83 - Attorney Admission procedures w/ a copy of L.R. 83.1 and 83.2 (TBB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $405; receipt number AKYEDC-5837774), filed by Octavian Aker. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Patterson, #3 Summons City of Dayton, #4 Exhibit A - Dayton Rental Property Inspection Ordinance, #5 Exhibit B- September 6, 2023 Meeting Minutes, #6 Exhibit C-January 3, 2023 Residential License Notification, #7 Exhibit D- February 7, 2023 Behne Email to Patterson, #8 Exhibit E- Rental License Citations, #9 Exhibit F- March 6, 2023 Patterson Letter to Aker Re Appeals Form, #10 Exhibit G- March, 15,2023 Aker Rental License Appeal, #11 Exhibit H-February 27, 2023 Email Behne Email to Patterson, #12 Exhibit I-Abandoned Property Notifications, #13 Exhibit J-March 20, 2023 Aker Abandoned Property Appeal, #14 Exhibit K-May 15, 2023 Code Board Rental License Final Order, #15 Exhibit L- May 15, 2023 Code Board Abandoned Property Final Order, #16 Exhibit M- May 15, 2023 Code Board Abandoned Property Final Order (2), #17 Exhibit N- Patterson Lien Affidavits, #18 Exhibit O-July 26, 2023 Settlement Agreement (Signed), #19 Exhibit P- November 8, 2023 Patterson and Darnell Emails Re Purchasing Aker Prop, #20 Exhibit Q- November 14, 2023 Dady Email to Patterson and Fossett, #21 Exhibit R- February 6, 2024 Letter from Fossett to Aker, #22 Exhibit S- February 22, 2024 1009 Maple Avenue Payoff Emails, #23 Exhibit T-March 13, 2024 627 Brooklyn Avenue Payoff Emails, #24 Exhibit U-March 19, 2024 940 Maple Avenue Payoff Emails, #25 Exhibit V- April 4, 2024 1007 Maple Avenue Payoff Emails)(TBB) |
| Conflict Check run. (TBB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
