US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,208
RSS Feed | View as table
Hicks v. Warden Mcrae We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2025cv00008
Petitioner: Equele Hicks
Respondent: Warden Mcrae
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Kelly v. Entzel et al
as 0:2025cv00006
Respondent: FCI Ashland, Acting Warden Christopher Entzel and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Petitioner: Jake Robert Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mason v. Entzel
as 0:2025cv00007
Petitioner: Jonathan Mason
Respondent: Warden Christopher Entzel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hill v. Paul
as 5:2025cv00004
Plaintiff: Kevin D. Hill
Defendant: Warden David Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bravata v. Warden FCI Ashland
as 0:2025cv00004
Petitioner: John Bravata
Respondent: Warden FCI Ashland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Nettles v. Warden, FCI Ashland
as 0:2025cv00001
Petitioner: Carl G. Nettles
Respondent: Warden, FCI Ashland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Davis v. Entzel
as 0:2025cv00002
Petitioner: Ruben Davis
Respondent: C. Entzel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. Entzel
as 0:2024cv00126
Petitioner: Jeffery Scott Jones
Respondent: Warden C. Entzel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Fortson v. Entzel
as 0:2024cv00127
Respondent: Acting Warden Christopher Entzel
Petitioner: Durrell Fortson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Young v. Paul
as 5:2024cv00385
Respondent: Warden Paul
Petitioner: Devon Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?