US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,111
Malloy v. USA
as 6:2024cv00025
Petitioner: Aaron Malloy
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Curry v. Akers
as 6:2024cv00021
Petitioner: Robert Curry
Respondent: Daniel Akers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Galvez v. LeMaster
as 0:2024cv00015
Petitioner: Vincente Galvez
Respondent: David LeMaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Harris v. USA
as 6:2024cv00013
Petitioner: Zachary Harris
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ast v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 7:2024cv00012
Petitioner: John Raymond Ast
Respondent: Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Robertson v. Paul
as 5:2024cv00027
Plaintiff: Demetrius M. Robertson
Respondent: Warden David Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Taylor v. Gilley
as 6:2024cv00010
Petitioner: Anthony D. Taylor
Respondent: John Gilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bennett v. Commonwealth Kentucky
as 2:2024cv00014
Plaintiff: Cecil Bennett
Defendant: Commonwealth Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Couch v. Akers
as 3:2024cv00006
Plaintiff: Alastair Couch
Defendant: Daniel Akers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pierce v. LeMaster We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2024cv00007
Petitioner: David L. Pierce
Respondent: David LeMaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?